Timeline for Can anyone work on the edit queue?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2017 at 16:11 | comment | added | Narusan | Is the review full again or what is the reason that I can't edit any posts right now? | |
| May 30, 2017 at 8:50 | comment | added | Shadow Wizard | @Narusan here you go. (SO chat for some reason) | |
| May 30, 2017 at 8:48 | comment | added | Shadow Wizard | @Narusan agree with all of this. Invited you to chat so we can keep discussing without making noise here, if you missed the notification let me know and I'll give the link. :) | |
| May 30, 2017 at 8:44 | comment | added | Narusan | @ShadowWizard There are so many low-quality are just simply unanswerable questions on Health.SE that should and must be deleted, yet no one bothers to do that. Whenever I find the time and a good question, I will answer it. Right now, the problem is the latter. I'm just going through the questions to find a good one to answer. Most of the time, OP was inactive for the last month and it just bumped up because the edit was finally approved or because it is so old, and I'm not wasting my time there. | |
| May 30, 2017 at 8:41 | comment | added | Shadow Wizard | @Narusan thanks, guess we can't do anything regarding moderators then. On second thought though, the core problem is giving good answers, not reviewing. And this requires more professional users, or people with enough time to perform thorough research. | |
| May 30, 2017 at 8:08 | comment | added | Narusan | @ShadowWizard See This post | |
| May 30, 2017 at 2:56 | comment | added | HDE 226868 | Obviously, a related post. | |
| May 30, 2017 at 2:54 | answer | added | HDE 226868 | timeline score: 3 | |
| May 29, 2017 at 10:48 | comment | added | Shadow Wizard | I am amazed the site moderators are ignoring this. IMO that is part of their role, when there is no choice. If I was a CM, I would be calling for elections on this site, removing all existing moderators ASAP. | |
| May 26, 2017 at 18:55 | comment | added | Jason C | One more graph that might be useful. | |
| May 26, 2017 at 18:28 | comment | added | Jason C | Although the long term future may be a bit bleaker. Also, there's only ~3 users with rep >= 900 and < 1000, i.e. near future new potential reviewers. | |
| May 26, 2017 at 18:20 | comment | added | Jason C | Fwiw, this should be manageable. Despite very low edit (and meta viewing) activity among editors, it looks like there's only 27 items in the queue. So it just needs two people to make a run to clear it. | |
| May 26, 2017 at 18:16 | history | edited | Kate Gregory | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| May 26, 2017 at 14:43 | history | asked | Kate Gregory | CC BY-SA 3.0 |