Timeline for Could we request mods to step down?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2017 at 14:36 | vote | accept | Narusan | ||
| May 5, 2017 at 5:12 | comment | added | Jon Ericson Staff | @Fomite: We don't close sites so much any more. For more of our current philosophy on closure, please see: Graduation, site closure, and a clearer outlook on the health of SE sites. | |
| May 5, 2017 at 5:11 | comment | added | Jon Ericson Staff | @Narusan: You can see a count of comments and how recently someone commented, but I don't think that's any better an indication of moderator effectiveness. I should also point out there's no reason a fourth moderator couldn't be appointed without removing any of the existing mods. But that won't make the person appointed any more of a leader than they already are. Many good beta sites are lead by users who are not interested in the tedium of being a mod. | |
| May 5, 2017 at 5:00 | comment | added | Narusan | That said, participating by asking or answering questions is not at all a responsibility of a diamond moderator. - I wanted to use these figures rather to show why one might get the impression that a moderator lost contact with the Community. I think comments would be a better statistic for this, but sadly I couldn't find numbers on that (maybe my reputation is too low...?) | |
| May 5, 2017 at 0:09 | comment | added | user283 | The closure rate is a problem too, in that it's too low, with obvious personal diagnosis questions remaining open. (Non-scientific answers not getting deleted is another one.) | |
| May 5, 2017 at 0:00 | comment | added | Fomite | Frankly, I'm surprised we haven't been shuttered yet. | |
| May 4, 2017 at 23:48 | history | answered | Jon EricsonStaff | CC BY-SA 3.0 |