Skip to main content
Medical Sciences Meta

Return to Answer

replaced http://health.stackexchange.com/ with https://health.stackexchange.com/
Source Link
Community Bot
Community Bot
  • 1

The medical research literature is rife with badly designed studies (and has a strong publication bias). This leads to, e.g. up to 70% of scientific studies not be reproduced. So even published studies are often not so reliable. One way to sort this mess would be to establish some basic criteria for assessing the quality of evidence in a medical research articlecriteria for assessing the quality of evidence in a medical research article.

The medical research literature is rife with badly designed studies (and has a strong publication bias). This leads to, e.g. up to 70% of scientific studies not be reproduced. So even published studies are often not so reliable. One way to sort this mess would be to establish some basic criteria for assessing the quality of evidence in a medical research article.

The medical research literature is rife with badly designed studies (and has a strong publication bias). This leads to, e.g. up to 70% of scientific studies not be reproduced. So even published studies are often not so reliable. One way to sort this mess would be to establish some basic criteria for assessing the quality of evidence in a medical research article.

replaced http://skeptics.stackexchange.com/ with https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/
Source Link
Community Bot
Community Bot
  • 1

The medical research literature is rife with badly designed studies (and has a strong publication bias). This leads to, e.g. up to 70% of scientific studies not be reproducedup to 70% of scientific studies not be reproduced. So even published studies are often not so reliable. One way to sort this mess would be to establish some basic criteria for assessing the quality of evidence in a medical research article.

The medical research literature is rife with badly designed studies (and has a strong publication bias). This leads to, e.g. up to 70% of scientific studies not be reproduced. So even published studies are often not so reliable. One way to sort this mess would be to establish some basic criteria for assessing the quality of evidence in a medical research article.

The medical research literature is rife with badly designed studies (and has a strong publication bias). This leads to, e.g. up to 70% of scientific studies not be reproduced. So even published studies are often not so reliable. One way to sort this mess would be to establish some basic criteria for assessing the quality of evidence in a medical research article.

Source Link
Franck Dernoncourt
Franck Dernoncourt
  • 10.4k
  • 13
  • 16

The medical research literature is rife with badly designed studies (and has a strong publication bias). This leads to, e.g. up to 70% of scientific studies not be reproduced. So even published studies are often not so reliable. One way to sort this mess would be to establish some basic criteria for assessing the quality of evidence in a medical research article.