Timeline for About Pro Tem moderator nominations... Is there a better way to discuss concerns with moderators?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 15:44 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.math.stackexchange.com/ with https://math.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 15, 2015 at 2:20 | comment | added | anongoodnurse | Good point. Yes, that definition rules out even some doctors straight out of residency! | |
| Apr 15, 2015 at 0:55 | comment | added | user139 | @anongoodnurse I read the comments as well. For instance, one of the questions could be is what qualifications do you have that would make you an expert or quasi-expert in the field. Here is the US legal definition of experts. However, that definition would bar almost everyone under a certain age. I am just throwing ideas out there for whomever to consider. | |
| Apr 14, 2015 at 23:32 | comment | added | anongoodnurse | Thanks for your answer! I've seen such questionnaires during elections (it might even be standard then). I've also seen rooms for less formal questions for particular candidates (and yes, they were more difficult to follow, and "@X" was always required.) It seems cleaner than what I see now on the pro tem meta question (I'm referring to the thread under michaelpri's nomination). Maybe, though, your idea can be implemented; I don't know much about how pro tems are chosen. I know it's not only by what the site participants think, but beyond that, it's a mystery. | |
| Apr 14, 2015 at 23:03 | history | answered | user139 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |