Skip to main content
Commonmark migration
Source Link

I think this is another way we need to approach the floods of "diagnose me" "advise me" questions. If we only downvote, it doesn't help the dilution of good questions. This way we pull out the good in their question and increase the % of good questions. Also, sometimes the answers to downvoted questions are great and deserve a good question stem!!

 

Please, those who have downvoted, look at questions that have been revised and see if it deserves an upvote instead! If not, consider revising it.

To edit or not to edit?

 

I happened to look at the front page and saw an interesting (to me) question which was appropriately closed as seeking personal medical advice. I edited the post to remove that aspect.

Personal medical advice questions are off-topic here on Medical Sciences.

 

We care! And that is why Medical Sciences cannot give individualized medical advice or diagnosis for multiple important reasons! Such questions will be revised or closed.

I think this is another way we need to approach the floods of "diagnose me" "advise me" questions. If we only downvote, it doesn't help the dilution of good questions. This way we pull out the good in their question and increase the % of good questions. Also, sometimes the answers to downvoted questions are great and deserve a good question stem!!

 

Please, those who have downvoted, look at questions that have been revised and see if it deserves an upvote instead! If not, consider revising it.

To edit or not to edit?

 

I happened to look at the front page and saw an interesting (to me) question which was appropriately closed as seeking personal medical advice. I edited the post to remove that aspect.

Personal medical advice questions are off-topic here on Medical Sciences.

 

We care! And that is why Medical Sciences cannot give individualized medical advice or diagnosis for multiple important reasons! Such questions will be revised or closed.

I think this is another way we need to approach the floods of "diagnose me" "advise me" questions. If we only downvote, it doesn't help the dilution of good questions. This way we pull out the good in their question and increase the % of good questions. Also, sometimes the answers to downvoted questions are great and deserve a good question stem!!

Please, those who have downvoted, look at questions that have been revised and see if it deserves an upvote instead! If not, consider revising it.

To edit or not to edit?

I happened to look at the front page and saw an interesting (to me) question which was appropriately closed as seeking personal medical advice. I edited the post to remove that aspect.

Personal medical advice questions are off-topic here on Medical Sciences.

We care! And that is why Medical Sciences cannot give individualized medical advice or diagnosis for multiple important reasons! Such questions will be revised or closed.

added 336 characters in body
Source Link
LаngLаngС
  • 6.9k
  • 1
  • 9
  • 14

As canbe found on several meta-meta posts:

"Please note that once you post a question or answer to this site, those posts become part of the collective efforts of others who have also contributed to that content. Posts that are potentially useful to others should not be removed except under extraordinary circumstances."

And a reminder from our own How to ask page:

And a reminder from our own How to ask page:

As canbe found on several meta-meta posts:

"Please note that once you post a question or answer to this site, those posts become part of the collective efforts of others who have also contributed to that content. Posts that are potentially useful to others should not be removed except under extraordinary circumstances."

And a reminder from our own How to ask page:

added 72 characters in body
Source Link
LаngLаngС
  • 6.9k
  • 1
  • 9
  • 14

Removing the personal/diagnosis/advice aspects is a first start to help users, we should try to do that. If that leaves the question in a poor state it is at least not as bad as before. The example was personal and lacking research. Now it's still lacking research and not personal. That is an improvement according to our standardsaccording to our standards.

Removing the personal/diagnosis/advice aspects is a first start to help users, we should try to do that. If that leaves the question in a poor state it is at least not as bad as before. The example was personal and lacking research. Now it's still lacking research and not personal. That is an improvement according to our standards.

Removing the personal/diagnosis/advice aspects is a first start to help users, we should try to do that. If that leaves the question in a poor state it is at least not as bad as before. The example was personal and lacking research. Now it's still lacking research and not personal. That is an improvement according to our standards.

added 175 characters in body
Source Link
LаngLаngС
  • 6.9k
  • 1
  • 9
  • 14
Loading
added 673 characters in body
Source Link
LаngLаngС
  • 6.9k
  • 1
  • 9
  • 14
Loading
added 1082 characters in body
Source Link
LаngLаngС
  • 6.9k
  • 1
  • 9
  • 14
Loading
deleted 17 characters in body
Source Link
LаngLаngС
  • 6.9k
  • 1
  • 9
  • 14
Loading
Source Link
LаngLаngС
  • 6.9k
  • 1
  • 9
  • 14
Loading